2025 Review of Public Health Laboratory Network Australia Neisseria gonorrhoeae National Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing Guidelines

Authors

  • David M Whiley UQ Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
  • Sebastiaan van Hal New South Wales Health Pathology, Microbiology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Todd M Pryce PathWest Laboratory Medicine WA, Department of Clinical Microbiology, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Monica M Lahra World Health Organization Collaborating Centre for STI and AMR, New South Wales Health Pathology Microbiology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2025.49.067

Keywords:

gonorrhoea, NAAT, supplementary, comment

Abstract

Since the introduction of Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests (NG-NAATs) into routine clinical use, false-positive results caused by cross-reaction with non-gonococcal Neisseria species have been an issue, particularly in specimens from the pharynx. Therefore, since 2005 in Australia, a confirmatory assay has been recommended, with a positive result issued only when both assays are concordant.

At the request of the Public Health Laboratory Network (PHLN) Australia, the National Neisseria Network (NNN) met to review the 2015 PHLN NG-NAATs Guidelines in October 2024, in the context that some later generation N. gonorrhoeae NAATs have claims for testing pharyngeal samples without the need for supplemental testing for confirmation. Adequacy of performance in this context was considered by the NNN as a positive predictive value of 95% in line with World Health Organization guidance.

Based on the 2024 review, it is recommended that:

  1. Supplementary testing continue to be performed for all non-urogenital (pharyngeal and rectal) samples.
  2. Supplementary testing be at the discretion of individual laboratories, based on local validation data demonstrating adequate performance based on WHO recommendations, for urogenital samples. Additional testing should continue to be considered when testing low-risk populations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lahra M, Hurley S, Van Hal S, Hogan T. Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Annual Report 2024. Com Dis Intell (2018). 2025;49. doi: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2025.49.056.

Ferreyra C, Osborn J, Moussy F, Alirol E, Lahra M, Whiley D et al. Developing target product profiles for Neisseria gonorrhoeae diagnostics in the context of antimicrobial resistance: an expert consensus. PLoS One. 2020;15(9):e0237424. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237424.

Whiley DM, Lahra MM, National Neisseria Network. Review of 2005 Public Health Laboratory Network Neisseria gonorrhoeae nucleic acid amplification tests guidelines. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2015;39(1):E42–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2015.39.6.

Upton A, Bromhead C, Whiley DM. Neisseria gonorrhoeae false-positive result obtained from a pharyngeal swab by using the Roche cobas 4800 CT/NG assay in New Zealand in 2012. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(5):1609–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.00485-13.

Pryce TM, Foti OR, Haygarth EJ, Whiley DM. Maximizing the Neisseria gonorrhoeae confirmatory rate and the genotypic detection of ciprofloxacin resistance for samples screened with cobas CT/NG. J Clin Microbiol. 2024;62(1):e0103923. doi: https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01039-23.

Whiley DM, Tapsall JW, Sloots TP. Nucleic acid amplification testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae: an ongoing challenge. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(1);3–15. doi: https://doi.org/10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050045.

Whiley DM, Tapsall JW, Nissen MD, Sloots TP. Neisseria gonorrhoeae NAAT? A problem down under. Microbiol Aust. 2007;28(1);9–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/MA07007.

Leslie DE, Azzato F, Ryan N, Fyfe J. An assessment of the Roche Amplicor Chlamydia trachomatis/Neisseria gonorrhoeae multiplex PCR assay in routine diagnostic use on a variety of specimen types. Commun Dis intell Q Rep. 2003;27(3):373–9. doi: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2003.27.64.

Smith DW, Tapsall JW, Lum G. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of nucleic acid detection tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Australia: a position paper on behalf of the Public Health Laboratory Network. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2005;29(4):358–65. doi: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2005.29.39.

Pryce TM. The past, present and future of molecular testing for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Australia: still challenging. Microbiol Aust. 2024;45:132–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/MA24037.

Downloads

Published

17/12/25

How to Cite

Whiley, David, Sebastiaan van Hal, Todd Pryce, and Monica Lahra. 2025. “2025 Review of Public Health Laboratory Network Australia Neisseria Gonorrhoeae National Nucleic Acid Amplification Testing Guidelines”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 49 (December). https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2025.49.067.