Was infectious syphilis being misclassified in remote Australian outbreaks? Evidence that informed modification of the national case definition

Authors

  • Annie Preston-Thomas Tropical Public Health Services, Cairns, Queensland
  • Nathan Ryder John Hunter Hospital, Hunter New England Local Health District, New South Wales
  • Sonia Harmen Tropical Public Health Services, Cairns, Queensland
  • Patricia Fagan Tropical Public Health Services, Cairns, Queensland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2015.39.50

Keywords:

infectious syphilis, case definition, Aboriginal health, Indigenous population

Abstract

Objective: To assess the ability of the national case definition to identify infectious syphilis during an outbreak affecting predominantly Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people in a remote Australian region.

Methods: A retrospective case series study of all non-congenital syphilis cases in the region notified between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2012 was performed. The national infectious syphilis case definition was compared with an expanded case definition derived from experienced clinician assessment and the definition proposed in the Interim Guidelines for the Public Health Management of Syphilis Outbreaks in Remote Populations in Australia from the Communicable Diseases Network Australia (CDNA).

Results: Two hundred and forty syphilis cases were notified, of which 44 (18.3%) were symptomatic. The national case definition classified 106 (44.2%) cases as infectious, compared with 182 (75.8%) using the clinician-derived expanded case definition and 165 (68.8%) by the interim guidelines case definition. Seven confirmed and 6 probable cases were diagnosed as a result of contact tracing of probable infectious cases identified using the expanded case definition.

Conclusions and implications: The national case definition for infectious syphilis applied in this remote Australian outbreak underestimated infectious cases when compared with experienced clinicians’ evaluation by up to 76 cases (42%) and was inadequate to monitor the magnitude of a syphilis outbreak in such a setting. This may compromise surveillance and resource allocation decisions, and could reduce the capacity to interrupt transmission and contain an outbreak. A revised national case definition, informed by this analysis, was released by CDNA in July 2015. Commun Dis Intell 2015;39(4):E571–E577.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

De Santis M, De Luca C, Mappa I, Spagnuolo T, Licameli A, Straface G, et al. Syphilis infection during pregnancy: fetal risks and clinical management. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2012; doi: 10.1155/2012/430585. PMCID: PMC3398589.

French P. Syphilis. BMJ 2007:334:143–147.

Peterman TA, Kahn RH, Ciesielski CA, Ortiz-Rios E, Furness BW, Blank S, et al. Misclassification of the stages of syphilis: implications for surveillance. Sex Transm Dis 2005; 32 (3):144–149.

Antibiotic Expert Groups. Therapeutic Guidelines: antibiotic. Version 15. Melbourne: Therapeutic Guidelines Limited; 2014.

Communicable Diseases Network Australia. Surveillance Case Definitions for the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. 1 January 2004 to 1 January 2014. Updated July 2014; accessed on 20 October 2014. Available from: http://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-casedefinitions.htm

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. STD Surveillance Case Definitions. Updated 10 December 2013; accessed on 19 August 2014. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/std/stats/CaseDefinitions-2014.pdf

The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. Enhanced surveillance of infections syphilis in New Zealand sexual health clinics – 2013. Porirua, New Zealand. Accessed on 13 February 2015. Available from: https://surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surveillance/STIEnhancedsyphilis/EnhancedSyphilis2013.pdf

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Case definition: syphilis. Accessed on 29 January 2015. Available from: http://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/activities/surveillance/sti/Pages/Case%20definition.aspx

The Kirby Institute. Bloodborne Viral and Sexually Transmitted Infections in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People: Surveillance and Evaluation Report 2014. Sydney: The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales; 2014. Accessed on 17 March 2015. Available from: http://kirby.unsw.edu.au/surveillance/2014-aboriginal-surveillance-report-hiv-viral-hepatitis-stis

Ward JS, Guy RJ, Akre SP, Middleton MG, Giele CM, Su JY, et al. Epidemiology of syphilis in Australia: moving toward elimination of infectious syphilis from remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities? Med J Aust 2011;194(10):525–529.

Communicable Diseases Network Australia. Interim Guidelines for the Public Health Management of Syphilis Outbreaks in Remote Populations in Australia. Accessed on 20 October 2014. Available from: http://webarchive.nla.gov.au/gov/20150622155130/http://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-song-syphilis.htm

Samoff E, Koumans EH, Gibson JJ, Ross M, Markowitz LE. Pre-treatment syphilis titers: distribution and evaluation of their use to distinguish early from late latent syphilis and to prioritize contact investigations. Sex Transm Dis 2009;36(12):789–793.

Hart G. Syphilis tests in diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Ann Intern Med 1986;104:368–376.

Communicable Disease Network of Australia. Syphilis – infectious (primary, secondary and early latent), less than 2 years duration case definition. Accessed on 16 July 2015. Available from: http://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cda-surveil-nndss-casedefs-cd_syphl2.htm

Downloads

Published

01/12/15

How to Cite

Preston-Thomas, Annie, Nathan Ryder, Sonia Harmen, and Patricia Fagan. 2015. “ Was Infectious Syphilis Being Misclassified in Remote Australian Outbreaks? Evidence That Informed Modification of the National Case Definition”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 39 (December):571-77. https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2015.39.50.

Issue

Section

Original article