Infectious diseases notification practices, Victoria 2013
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2016.40.31Keywords:
public health surveillance, public health practice, disease notification, communicable disease control, Indigenous population, VictoriaAbstract
Introduction: Infectious disease notification practices in Victoria were reviewed to identify areas for potential improvement.
Methods: Confirmed or probable cases of certain infectious diseases required to be notified to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Victoria in 2013, excluding elevated blood lead, foodborne or water-borne illness with 2 or more related cases and chlamydial infection, were analysed according to: notification source of doctor ± laboratory vs. laboratory-only; routine follow-up by public health staff for selected conditions vs. not routine; priority for Indigenous status reporting for 18 priority conditions with a target of ≥ 95% completeness vs. other conditions with a target of ≥ 80% completeness; and urgency of notification (conditions requiring immediate [same day] notification vs. conditions requiring notification within 5 days).
Results: Almost half (49%) the 34,893 confirmed and probable cases were notified by laboratory report alone. Indigenous status was complete for 48% of cases. Indigenous status was more likely to be completed for conditions with active vs. no active follow-up (RR 1.88 (95% CI 1.84–1.92)) and priority conditions for Indigenous status reporting vs. other conditions (RR 1.62 (95% CI 1.59–1.66)). Among conditions without active follow-up, doctor-notified cases had more complete Indigenous status reporting than laboratory-only notified cases (86% vs. 6%, RR 15.06 (95% CI 14.15–16.03)). Fewer notifications requiring same day notification were received within the legislated time frame (59%) than notifications required to be notified within 5 days (90%).
Discussion: DHHS Victoria handles a large volume of infectious disease notifications. Incomplete Indigenous status reporting, particularly for conditions without active follow-up, and delayed notification of conditions requiring immediate attention warrant attention. These findings will be used to improve notification practices in Victoria. Commun Dis Intell 2016;40(3):E317–E325.
Downloads
References
State Government of Victoria, Communicable Disease Epidemiology and Surveillance Section, Health Protection Branch, Department of Health. Operations manual for notifiable infectious diseases surveillance: Public Health Event Surveillance System v2. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria 2014.
NNDSS Annual Report Writing Group. Australia’s notifiable disease status, 2013: Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun Dis Intell 2015;39(3):E387–E478.
Berzins R, Fielding J. Medical practitioner notification trends and practices in Victoria, 2007–2008. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2009;12(1):7–11.
Fielding J. Infectious disease notification trends and practices in Victoria, 2004. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2005;8(3):72–75.
Fielding J. Infectious disease notification trends and practices in Victoria, 2006. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2007;10(4):86–90.
Fielding J. Infectious disease notification trends and practices in Victoria, 2009. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2010;13(3):85–90.
Rowe S. Infectious disease notification trends and practices in Victoria, 2011. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2012;15(3):92–97.
Communicable Diseases Network Australia Case Definitions Working Group. Surveillance case definitions for the Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, 1 January 2004–1 January 2016. 2015 Accessed April 2016. Available from: http://www.health.gov.au/casedefinitions
Queensland Department of Health. Methods for reporting population health status. Release 5. Brisbane: Queensland Government; 2015.
Adekoya N, Truman BI, Ajani UA. Completeness of reporting of race and ethnicity data in the Nationally Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System, United States, 2006–2010. J Public Health Manag Pract. 2015;21(2):E16–E22.
Birbilis E. Improving infectious disease notification project: an update. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin. 2011;14(2):52–53.
Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The inclusion of Indigenous status on pathology request forms. Canberra: AIHW 2013.
Rowe S, Cowie BC. Using data linkage to improve the completeness of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status in communicable disease notifications in Victoria. Aust N Z J Public Health 2016;40(2):148–153.
Health Outcomes International Pty Ltd. Methods and systems used to measure and monitor occupational disease and injury in New Zealand: NOHSAC Technical Report 2. Wellington: National Occupation Health and Safety Advisory Committee; 2005.
Birbilis E, Moran R. Improving infectious disease notification rates: a medical practitioner survey. Victorian Infectious Diseases Bulletin 2009;12(1):12–13.
NNDSS Annual Report Writing Group. Australia’s notifiable disease status, 2012: Annual report of the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Commun Dis Intell 2015;39(1):E46–E136.
Australian Government, Department of Health. National framework for communicable disease control: Commonwealth of Australia; 2014.
NSW Department of Health. Population Health Surveillance Strategy, NSW 2011 to 2020. Sydney: NSW Department of Health; 2011.
Ontario Agency for Health Protection and Promotion (Public Health Ontario). Infectious disease surveillance framework 2014–2019: Better data for better action. Toronto, ON: Ontario Government; 2014.
Conference abstract; Communicable Disease Control Conference, Brisbane 2015. Project launch: Linkage of the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register data to state-based health datasets to evaluate and inform Australia’s immunisation program. Commun Dis Intell 2015;39(3):E536.
Centres for Disease Control and Prevention. National notifiable diseases surveillance system: Electronic laboratory reporting. 2015 (updated May 2015) Accessed April 2016. Available from: http://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/meaningful-use-electronic-lab-reporting.html
Moore KM, Reddy V, Kapell D, Balter S. Impact of electronic laboratory reporting on hepatitis A surveillance in New York City. J Public Health Manag Pract 2008;14(5):437–441.
Samoff E, Fangman MT, Fleischauer AT, Waller AE, MacDonald PDM. Improvements in timeliness resulting from implementation of electronic laboratory reporting and an electronic disease surveillance system. Public Health Rep 2013;128(5):393–398.
Health Protection NSW. Communicable diseases – Establish electronic notification of diseases by laboratories. 2015 (updated 3rd September 2015) Accessed May 2016. Available from: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/hpr/Pages/201502-diseases.aspx#ELR
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Communicable Diseases Intelligence
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
