An evaluation of enhanced surveillance of hospitalised COVID-19 patients to inform the public health response in Victoria

Authors

  • Stephanie J Curtis National Centre for Epidemiology and Population Health, the Australian National University, Australia Capital Territory, Australia ;Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
  • Zoe Cutcher Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
  • Judith Brett Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Victoria, Australia
  • Simon Burrell Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Victoria, Australia
  • Michael Richards Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre, the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity, Victoria, Australia
  • Daneeta Hennessy Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
  • Rebecca Gang Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia
  • Colleen Lau Department of Global Health, the Australian National University, Australia Capital Territory, Australia
  • Stacey Rowe Department of Health and Human Services, Victoria, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98

Keywords:

coronavirus, emergency response, evaluation, hospitalisations,, pandemic, surveillance

Abstract

Background

Public health surveillance is crucial for supporting a rapid and effective response to public health emergencies. In response to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, an enhanced surveillance system of hospitalised COVID-19 patients was established by the Victorian Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and the Victorian Healthcare Associated Infection Surveillance System Coordinating Centre. The system aimed to reduce workforce capacity constraints and increase situational awareness on the status of hospitalised patients.

Methods

The system was evaluated, using guidelines from the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, against eight attributes: acceptability; data quality; flexibility; representativeness; simplicity; stability; timeliness; and usefulness. Evidence was generated from stakeholder consultation, participant observation, document review, systems review, issues log review and audits. Data were collected and analysed over a period of up to three months, covering pre- and post-implementation from March to June 2020.

Results

This system was rapidly established by leveraging established relationships and infrastructure. Stakeholders agreed that the system was important but was limited by a reliance on daily manual labour (including weekends), which impeded scalability. The ability of the system to perform well in each attribute was expected to shift with the severity of the pandemic; however, at the time of this evaluation, when there were an average 23 new cases per day (0.3 cases per 100,000 population per day), the system performed well.

Conclusion

This enhanced surveillance system was useful and achieved its key DHHS objectives during the COVID-19 public health emergency in Victoria. Recommendations for improvement were made to the current and future systems, including the need to plan alternatives to improve the system’s scalability and to maintain stakeholder acceptability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Moss R, Wood J, Brown D, Shearer FM, Black AJ, Glass K et al. Coronavirus disease model to inform transmission reducing measures and health system preparedness, Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020;26(12). doi: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612.202530.

COVID-19 National Incident Room Surveillance Team. COVID-19, Australia: epidemiology report 19: fortnightly reporting period ending 21 June 2020. Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2020;44. doi: https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.54.

Victorian State Government Health and Human Services (DHHS). COVID-19 pandemic plan for the Victorian Health Sector: version 1.0. Melbourne: Victorian State Government DHHS; 10 March 2020. Available from: https://www2.health.vic.gov.au/about/publications/researchandreports/covid-19-pandemic-plan-for-vic.

Australian Government Department of Health. Australian health sector emergency response plan for novel coronavirus (COVID-19). (Publications number: 12723.) Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 18 February 2020. Available from: https://www.health.gov.au/resources/publications/australian-health-sector-emergency-response-plan-for-novel-coronavirus-covid-19.

German RR, Horan JM, Lee LM, Milstein B, Pertowski CA, Waller MN et al. Updated guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems; recommendations from the Guidelines Working Group. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2001;50(RR-13):1–35.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208.

Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

Livingston E, Bucher K. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(14):1335.

Australian Government Department of Health, Communicable Diseases Network Australia (CDNA). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): CDNA national guidelines for public health units. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health; 2020. Available from: https://www1.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/cdna-song-novel-coronavirus.htm.

Downloads

Published

24/12/20

How to Cite

Curtis, Stephanie J, Zoe Cutcher, Judith Brett, Simon Burrell, Michael Richards, Daneeta Hennessy, Rebecca Gang, Colleen Lau, and Stacey Rowe. 2020. “An Evaluation of Enhanced Surveillance of Hospitalised COVID-19 Patients to Inform the Public Health Response in Victoria ”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 44 (December). https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.98.

Most read articles by the same author(s)