Revised guidelines for Australian laboratories performing mycobacteriology testing

Authors

  • Ivan Bastian SA Pathology, PO Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide SA 5000
  • Lisa Shephard SA Pathology, PO Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide SA 5000
  • Richard Lumb SA Pathology, PO Box 14, Rundle Mall, Adelaide SA 5000
  • National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.2

Abstract

Mycobacteriology laboratories play a key role in tuberculosis (TB) control by providing phenotypic and molecular diagnostics, by performing molecular typing to aid contact tracing, and by supporting research and similar laboratories in Australia’s neighbouring countries where TB is prevalent. The National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee (NTAC) published a set of laboratory guidelines in 2006 aiming to document the infrastructure, equipment, staffing and work practices required for safe high-quality work in Australian mycobacteriology laboratories. These revised guidelines have the same aims and have been through a similar extensive consultative peer-review process involving the Mycobacterium Reference Laboratory (MRL) network, the Mycobacterium Special Interest Group (SIG) of the Australian Society for Microbiology (ASM), and other relevant national bodies.

This revised document contains several significant changes reflecting the publication of new biosafety guidelines and tuberculosis standards by various national and international organisations, technology developments – such as the MPT64-based immunochromatographic tests (ICTs) and the Xpert MTB/RIF assay – and updated work practices in mycobacteriology laboratories. The biosafety recommendations affirm the latest Australian/New Zealand Standard 2243.3: 2010 and promote a biorisk assessment approach that, in addition to the risk categorisation of the organism, also considers the characteristics of the procedure being performed. Using this biorisk assessment approach, limited manipulations, such as Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) microscopy, MPT64 ICTs, and culture inactivation/DNA extraction for molecular testing, may be performed on a positive TB culture in a PC2 laboratory with additional features and work practices. Other significant changes include recommendations on the integration of MPT64 ICTs and novel molecular tests into TB laboratory workflows to provide rapid accurate results that improve the care of TB patients. This revised document supersedes the original 2006 publication. NTAC will periodically review these guidelines and provide updates as new laboratory technologies become available. Latest update: 29 April 2021. Refer to Appendix A for details.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Toms C, Stapledon R, Waring J, Douglas P, National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee. Tuberculosis notifications in Australia, 2012 and 2013. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2015;39(2):E217–35.

World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. (WHO/HTM/TB/2016.13) Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/archive/en/

National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee. Guidelines for Australian mycobacteriology laboratories. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2006;30(1):116–28.

Drobniewski FA, Hoffner S, Rusch-Gerdes S, Skenders G, Thomsen V; WHO European Laboratory Strengthening Task Force. Recommended standards for modern tuberculosis laboratory services in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2006;28(5):903–9.

Association of Public Health Laboratories Tuberculosis Steering Committee. Core TB Laboratory Services for Public Health Laboratories. Washington, DC: Association of Public Health Laboratories; 2009. Available from: https://www.aphl.org/programs/infectious_disease/tuberculosis/Documents/ID_2009Dec_Core-TB-Services.pdf

US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and the National Institutes of Health. Biosafety in microbiological and biomedical laboratories, 5th ed., 2009. HHS Publication No. (CDC) 21-1112.

New Zealand Ministry of Health. Guidelines for tuberculosis control in New Zealand. [Internet.] Available from: https://www.health.govt.nz/publication/guidelines-tuberculosis-control-new-zealand-2019

World Health Organization. Tuberculosis laboratory biosafety manual. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. (WHO/HTM/TB/2012.11) Available from: https://www.who.int/tb/publications/2012/tb_biosafety/en/

Association of Public Health Laboratories. Mycobacterum tuberculosis: assessing your laboratory. Available from: https://www.aphl.org/AboutAPHL/publications/Documents/ID_2013Aug_Mycobacterium-Tuberculosis-Assessing-Your-Laboratory.pdf

Public Health Agency of Canada, Canadian Lung Association/Canadian Thoracic Society. Canadian tuberculosis standards, 7th ed., 2014. [Internet.] Available from: https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/infectious-diseases/canadian-tuberculosis-standards-7th-edition.html

Public Health England. UK Standards for Microbiology Investigations: Investigation of specimens for Mycobacterium species. [Internet.] Public Health England; 2014. Available from: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/smi-b-40-investigation-of-specimens-for-mycobacterium-species

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Handbook on TB laboratory diagnostic methods for the European Union. Stockholm: ECDC; 2018. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/handbook-tuberculosis-laboratory-diagnostic-methods-european-union-updated-2018

Downloads

Published

27/05/21

How to Cite

Bastian, Ivan, Lisa Shephard, Richard Lumb, and National Tuberculosis Advisory Committee. 2021. “Revised Guidelines for Australian Laboratories Performing Mycobacteriology Testing ”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 44 (May). https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.2.

Issue

Section

Policy and guidelines

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>