Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease surveillance in Australia: update to December 2017
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2019.43.32Keywords:
Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease, prion disease, transmissible spongiform encephalopathy, disease surveillanceAbstract
Nationwide surveillance of human prion diseases (also known as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies), the most common being Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease (CJD), is performed by the Australian National Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease Registry (ANCJDR), based at the University of Melbourne. National surveillance encompasses the period since 1970, with prospective surveillance occurring from 1993 onwards. Over this prospective surveillance period considerable developments have occurred, especially in relation to pre-mortem diagnostics, the delineation of new disease subtypes and a heightened awareness of prion diseases in the health care setting. The surveillance practices of the ANCJDR have evolved and adapted accordingly. Since the ANCJDR began offering cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) 14-3-3 protein testing in Australia in September 1997, the annual number of referrals has steadily increased to a maximum of 508 in 2017. The number of CSF test referrals in 2017 represents a 20% increase compared to that of 2016. In 2017, there was an overall stabilisation of the annual incidence rate of confirmed prion disease in Australia at expected levels; 72 persons with suspected human prion disease were added to the national register, with 72% of all suspected CJD cases undergoing neuropathological examination. The majority of the 72 suspected cases added to the register are as of 31 December 2017 still classified as “incomplete” (47 cases), while four cases were excluded by either detailed clinical follow-up (1 case) or neuropathological examination (3 cases); 19 cases were classified as definite and two as probable prion disease. No cases of variant CJD (vCJD) were confirmed.
Downloads
References
Klug GM, Boyd A, Zhao T, Stehmann C, Simpson M, McLean CA, et al. Surveillance for Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in Australia: update to December 2012. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2013;37(2):E115–20.
Allars M. Report of the inquiry into the use of pituitary derived hormones in Australia and Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease. Canberra: AGPS, 1994.
Zerr I, Kallenberg K, Summers DM, Romero C, Taratuto A, Heinemann U et al. Updated clinical diagnostic criteria for sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Brain. 2009;132:2659–2668.
Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease International Surveillance Network: Surveillance Data. [Internet] Accessed on 16 February 2017. Available from: http://www.eurocjd.ed.ac.uk/surveillance%20data%201.html
Klug GM, Wand H, Simpson M, Boyd A, Law M, Masters CL et al. Intensity of human prion disease surveillance predicts observed disease incidence. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84:1372–1377.
Australian Bureau of Statistics. 3101.0 Australian Demographic Statistics – Sept 2017. Tables 51 to 59. Accessed 29/05/2018. Available from: http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/DetailsPage/3101.0Sep%202017?OpenDocument
Mok T, Jaunmuktane Z, Joiner S, Campbell T, Morgan C, Wakerley B et al. Variant Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease in a patient with heterozygosity at prnp codon 129. N Engl J Med 2017;376:292–5.
The Royal College of Pathologists of Australasia Autopsy Working Party. The decline of the hospital autopsy: a safety and quality issue for healthcare in Australia. Med J Aust. 2004;180:281–5.
Jackett L and McLean C. Hospital autopsy audit: discordant primary clinical diagnoses are found in 20% of cases in a reducing autopsy case load. Selection bias or significant findings? Pathology. 2015;47:499–502.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Communicable Diseases Intelligence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
