Pandemics in New South Wales prisons: the more things change…
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2021.45.7Keywords:
Prison medicine, history, pandemic, infectious disease, public health, outbreakAbstract
Background: The current COVID-19 pandemic is not the first time New South Wales prisons have faced contagion. This paper examines the current responses in New South Wales prisons to the threat of COVID-19 to prisoner health, by contrasting contemporary activities with actions and policy developed during two historical epidemics: the influenza epidemic of 1860 and pandemic of 1919.
Method: Epidemiological information relating to cases of disease in NSW prisons during the 1860 and 1919 influenza epidemics was obtained from the Comptroller-General’s reports for the specific outbreak years and for the preceding and succeeding five-year periods. Additional archival sources such as digitised newspaper reports and articles available through the National Library of Australia were analysed for closer detail. The management of these outbreaks was compared to current strategies to mitigate against risk from the COVID-19 pandemic in the NSW prison system.
Results: Interesting similarities were discovered in relation to the management of the historic influenza outbreaks in NSW prisons and in the management of the current COVID-19 pandemic. An outbreak of influenza in mid-1860 impacted seven penal institutions in Sydney and Parramatta. Infection rates at these institutions were between 3.1% and 100%; the mean rate was 41.8%. The public health measures employed at the time included allowing ‘air circulation freely night and day’, and treatments that were ‘tonical and stimulatory’.
In 1919, the attack rate of influenza infection for Sydney was 358 per 1,000 population, whereas for the two large penitentiaries in Sydney, it was only 26 per 1,000 population. Similarly, the reported death rates were much reduced for prisoners compared to the general community.
The recorded measures in 1919 included: disinfecting of the gaol buildings; inoculation (experimental but of no value); the compulsory wearing of masks; the closure of the border between NSW and Victoria; fumigation and inhalation disinfection; daily examination with isolation for symptomatic staff; and quarantine of new arrivals. These are remarkably similar to current strategies.
Discussion: While the past 100 or more years have brought huge progress in scientific knowledge, public health approaches remain the mainstay of outbreak management in prisons; and, as in 1919, the opportunity for Australia to observe the rest of the world and plan for action has not been wasted. Prisons pose a potential risk for pandemic spread but they also present a unique opportunity for reducing disease risk by ironic virtue of the ‘separate system’ that was recognised even 100 years ago as characteristic of these institutions.
Downloads
References
Saloner B, Parish K, Ward JA, DiLaura G, Dolovich S. COVID-19 cases and deaths in federal and state prisons. JAMA. 2020;324(6). doi: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12528.
The influenza in Sydney. [Newspaper article.] The Sydney Morning Herald. 13 June 1860; p. 8. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article13041763.
Extract from the Report of the Visiting Surgeon, Dr Robert Lee-Brown. Report of the Comptroller-General of Prisons New South Wales, 1919. Sydney: Legislative Assembly of New South Wales, second session, Government Printer, 1920; 16.
McCauley S. Comptroller-General. Report of the Comptroller-General of Prisons New South Wales 1918. Legislative Assembly of New South Wales, Government Printer, 1919: 9–10.
Curson P. Deadly encounters: how infectious disease helped shape Australia. United Kingdom: Arena Books, 2015: 52, 56–7.
McCracken K, Curson P. Flu downunder: a demographic and geographic analysis of the 1919 pandemic in Sydney, Australia. In Phillips H, Killingray D, eds. The Spanish Influenza Pandemic of 1918–1919: New Perspectives. (Routledge Studies in the Social History of Medicine.) London: Routledge, 2003: 110–31, 272–5.
State Government of New South Wales: State archives and records. Pneumonic influenza (Spanish Flu) 1919. [Internet.] Sydney: State Government of New South Wales. Available from: https://www.records.nsw.gov.au/archives/collections-and-research/guides-and-indexes/stories/pneumonic-influenza-1919.
Extract from the Report of the Visiting Surgeon (Grafton Gaol), Dr T.J. Henry. Report of the Comptroller-General of Prisons New South Wales, 1919. Sydney: Legislative Assembly of New South Wales, second session, Government Printer, 1920; 32.
The Maitland gaol. [Newspaper notice.] The Maitland Daily Mercury. 5 July 1919; p. 4. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page14946088.
Another prisoner affected. [Newspaper article.] The Sydney Morning Herald. 31 March 1919; p. 10. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-page1255161.
Case sent to Grafton: amazing official action. “An absolute scandal”. [Newspaper article.] The Grafton Argus and Clarence River General. 26 March 1919; p. 2. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article235677357.
Influenza epidemic: case in Grafton gaol. Prisoner from Long Bay. [Newspaper article.] The Macleay Argus. 27 March 1919; p. 5. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article234226304.
McCauley S. Comptroller-General. Report of the Comptroller-General of Prisons New South Wales 1918. Legislative Assembly of New South Wales, Government Printer, 1919: 36.
A Long Bay protest. [Newspaper article.] The Sunday Times. 23 March 1919; p. 2. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article123215979.
McCauley S. Comptroller-General. Report of the Comptroller-General of Prisons New South Wales 1918. Legislative Assembly of New South Wales, Government Printer, 1919: 8.
Parliament of New South Wales. COVID-19 Legislation Amendment (Emergency Measures—Attorney General) Bill 2020. [Legislation.] Sydney: Parliament of New South Wales; 2020. Available from: https://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/bills/Pages/bill-details.aspx?pk=3746.
Cases in gaol. [Newspaper article.] The Daily Herald. 4 April 1919; p. 4. Available from: http://nla.gov.au/nla.news-article106457852.
Supreme Court of Victoria. Rowson v Department of Justice and Community Safety [2020] VSC 236. [Judicial case.] Melbourne: Supreme Court of Victoria; 1 May 2020.
Simpson PL, Butler TG. Covid-19, prison crowding, and release policies. BMJ. 2020;369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1551.
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Communicable Diseases Intelligence

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
