Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2018

Authors

  • Geoffrey W Coombs Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Denise A Daley Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Shakeel Mowlaboccus Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Yung Thin Lee Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Stanley Pang Antimicrobial Resistance and Infectious Disease (AMRID) Research Laboratory, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia; Department of Microbiology, PathWest Laboratory Medicine-WA, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  • Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.19

Keywords:

Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR), antimicrobial resistance surveillance, Enterococcus faecium, Enterococcus faecalis, vancomycin resistant enterococci (VRE), bacteraemia

Abstract

From 1 January to 31 December 2018, thirty-six institutions around Australia participated in the Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP). The aim of AESOP 2018 was to determine the proportion of enterococcal bacteraemia isolates in Australia that were antimicrobial resistant, and to characterise the molecular epidemiology of the E. faecium isolates. Of the 1,248 unique episodes of bacteraemia investigated, 93.5% were caused by either E. faecalis (54.2%) or E. faecium (39.3%). Ampicillin resistance was not detected in E. faecalis but was detected in 89.4% of E. faecium. Vancomycin non-susceptibility was not detected in E. faecalis but was reported in 45.0% of E. faecium. Overall 49.3% of E. faecium isolates harboured vanA or vanB genes. Of the vanA/vanB positive E. faecium isolates, 52.9% harboured vanA genes and 46.2% vanB genes; 0.8% harboured both vanA and vanB genes. The percentage of E. faecium bacteraemia isolates resistant to vancomycin in Australia is substantially higher than that seen in most European countries. E. faecium consisted of 59 multilocus sequence types (STs) of which 74.4% of isolates were classified into six major STs containing ten or more isolates. All major STs belong to clonal cluster (CC) 17, a major hospital-adapted polyclonal E. faecium cluster. The predominant STs (ST17, ST1424, ST796, ST80, ST1421, and ST262) were found across most regions of Australia. The most predominant clone was ST17 which was identified in all regions except the Australian Capital Territory and the Northern Territory. Overall, 55.8% of isolates belonging to the six predominant STs harboured vanA or vanB genes. The AESOP 2018 study has shown that enterococcal bacteraemias in Australia are frequently caused by polyclonal ampicillin-resistant high-level gentamicin-resistant vanA- or vanB-harbouring E. faecium which have limited treatment options.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pinholt M, Ostergaard C, Arpi M, Bruun NE, Schønheyder HC, Gradel KO et al. Incidence, clinical characteristics and 30-day mortality of enterococcal bacteraemia in Denmark 2006–2009: a population-based cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(2):145–51.

Deshpande LM, Fritsche TR, Moet GJ, Biedenbach DJ, Jones RN. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococci from North America and Europe: a report from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;58(2):163–70.

Murray BE. The life and times of the Enterococcus. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1990;3(1):46–65.

Simonsen GS, Småbrekke L, Monnet DL, Sørensen TL, Møller JK, Kristinsson KG et al. Prevalence of resistance to ampicillin, gentamicin and vancomycin in Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates from clinical specimens and use of antimicrobials in five Nordic hospitals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(2):323–31.

Treitman AN, Yarnold PR, Warren J, Noskin GA. Emerging incidence of Enterococcus faecium among hospital isolates (1993 to 2002). J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):462–3.

Boucher HW, Talbot GH, Bradley JS, Edwards JE, Gilbert D, Rice LB et al. Bad bugs, no drugs: no ESKAPE! An update from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:1–12.

Christiansen KJ, Turnidge JD, Bell JM, George NM, Pearson JC, Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance in Enterococcus isolates in Australia, 2005: report from the Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2007;31(4):392–7.

Coombs GW, Daley D, Pearson JC, Ingram PR. A change in the molecular epidemiology of vancomycin resistant enterococci in Western Australia. Pathology. 2014;46(1):73–5.

Coombs GW, Pearson JC, Daley DA, Le T, Robinson OJ, Gottlieb T et al. Molecular epidemiology of enterococcal bacteremia in Australia. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;52(3):897–905.

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). M100-S24 Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; Twenty-fourth informational supplement. Villanova, PA, USA, 2014.

European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Clinical breakpoints – bacteria v 5.0. 2015. Available from: http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria/previous_versions_of_documents/

Seemann T, Goncalves da Silva A, Bulach DM, Schultz MB, Kwong JC, Howden BP. Nullarbor. San Francisco; Github. [Accessed: 03 Jun 2016]. Available from: https://github.com/tseemann/nullarbor

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Europe 2018. [Internet.] European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; 2019. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-antimicrobial-resistance-europe-2018

Coombs GW, Pearson JC, Daley DA, Le TT, Robinson JO, Gottlieb T et al. Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme annual report, 2013. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2014;38(4):E320–6.

Coombs GW, Daley DA, Lee YT, Pang S, Pearson JC, Robinson JO et al. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme annual report, 2014.Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2016;40(2):E236–43.

Coombs GW, Daley DA, Lee YT, Pang S, Bell JM, Turnidge JD. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2015. Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2018;42. pii: S2209-6051(18)00015-5.

Coombs GW, Daley DA, Lee YT, Pang S, Bell JM, Turnidge JD. Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2016. Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2018;42. pii: S2209-6051(18)00020-9.

Geoffrey W Coombs GW, Denise A Daley DA, Yung Thin Lee YT, Dr Stanley Pang S. Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2017. Commun Dis Intell (2018). 2019;43. https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2019.43.42.

Downloads

Published

16/03/20

How to Cite

Coombs, Geoffrey W, Denise A Daley, Shakeel Mowlaboccus, Yung Thin Lee, Stanley Pang, and Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance. 2020. “Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance (AGAR) Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) Annual Report 2018”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 44 (March). https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2020.44.19.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>