Augmentation of influenza surveillance with rapid antigen detection at the point-of-care: results of a pilot study in Tasmania, 2004

Authors

  • Kate S Turner Communicable Diseases Surveillance, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Tasmania
  • Kelly A Shaw Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Tasmania
  • David J Coleman Communicable Diseases Surveillance, Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Tasmania
  • Avner Misrachi Department of Health and Human Services, Hobart, Tasmania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2006.30.15

Keywords:

influenza, laboratory diagnosis

Abstract

Tasmania contributes very few laboratory confirmed cases to Australia’s national influenza surveillance statistics. In 2004, a study was conducted to pilot test sentinel syndromic surveillance for influenza-like illness supplemented by point-of-care testing using the Binax Now Flu A Test Kit and by viral culture, to assess the feasibility and acceptability of this method of surveillance. Overall, the goal of such a system would be to increase laboratory surveillance activity within Tasmania and increase the number of specimens sent for viral culture. Five sites participated in the study, including three public hospital emergency departments and two general practices. Despite being conducted during a period of low influenza activity, the pilot study demonstrated that augmentation of syndromic surveillance with point-of-care testing is both feasible and acceptable but is best conducted in the general practice setting. Commun Dis Intell 2006;30:201–204.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mandell G, Bennett J, Dolin R, editors. Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases. 4th edn New York: Churchill Livingston; 1995.

Lange W, Schottler M. Real-time influenza surveillance in Germany – results of a pilot project. Med Microbiol Immunol 2002;191:139–144.

Kelly H, Birch C. The causes and diagnosis of influenza-like illness. Aust Fam Physician 2004;33:305–309.

Carman WF, Wallace LA, Walker J, McIntyre S, Noone A, Christie P. Rapid virological surveillance of community influenza infection in general practice. BMJ 2000;321:736–737.

Ruest A, Michaud S, Deslandes S, Frost EH. Comparison of the Directigen Flu A+B test, the QuickVue influenza test, and clinical case definition to viral culture and reverse transcription-PCR for rapid diagnosis of influenza virus infection. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3487–3493.

Rawlinson WD, Waliuzzaman ZM, Fennell M, Appleman JR, Shimasaki CD, Carter IW. New point of care test is highly specific but less sensitive for influenza virus A and B in children and adults. J Med Virol 2004;74:127–131.

Sosin DM. Draft framework for evaluating syndromic surveillance systems. J Urban Health 2003;80 Suppl 1:8–13.

Effler PV, Ieong MC, Tom T, Nakata M. Enhancing public health surveillance for influenza virus by incorporating newly available rapid diagnostic tests. Emerg Infect Dis 2002;8:23–28.

Kelly H, Murphy A, Leong W, Leydon J, Tresise P, Gerrard M, et al. Laboratory-supported influenza surveillance in Victorian sentinel general practices. Commun Dis Intell 2000;24:379–383.

Li J, Hampson A, Roche PW, Yohannes K, Spencer JD. Annual report of the National Influenza Surveillance Scheme, 2004. Commun Dis Intell 2005;29:125–136.

Downloads

Published

01/06/06

How to Cite

Turner, Kate S, Kelly A Shaw, David J Coleman, and Avner Misrachi. 2006. “Augmentation of Influenza Surveillance With Rapid Antigen Detection at the Point-of-Care: Results of a Pilot Study in Tasmania, 2004”. Communicable Diseases Intelligence 30 (June):201-4. https://doi.org/10.33321/cdi.2006.30.15.

Issue

Section

Original article

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)